- Key Focus Areas
- Enquiries and Complaints
- Human Rights
- The Treaty
- Disabled People
- Race Relations
- International & UN
- Office of Human Rights Proceedings
- Commission presents Waitakere College Indian Culture Group with Inclusiveness Award
- Award winning speech from the NZ Race Unity Speech Awards thrills judges
- The French Embassy is calling on young Kiwis to apply for a Human Rights programme in Paris.
- EVENT RECAP: 2014 Summerz End Youth Fest
- The Te Urunga Award for Inclusiveness presented to Mt Albert Grammar School
- MORE NEWS
- United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Statement
- EVENT: ‘Women Art Revolution’
- Human Rights Commission urges New Zealand women to get stroppy
- Human Rights Commission Welcomes New Zealand’s Top Social Progress Index Ranking
- Jackie Blue to be interviewed on ‘WomenPower’
- Funding gaps for sexual violence victims a blemish on human rights
- Human Rights Commission mourns the passing of Dr Merimeri Penfold
- Human Rights Commission welcomes Government’s home care workers announcement
- Call for Applicants for the European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation
- Commission congratulates PSA report on family violence
- VIDEO: World Down Syndrome Day #DearFutureMom
- Human Rights Commission’s position on religion in schools
- Commission launches review of Race Relations in 2013
- Harmful Digital Communications Bill
- World Down Syndrome Day ̶ an opportunity to celebrate diversity
- ALL NEWS
Court of Appeal decision in favour of parents in long running case
The Director of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings Robert Hesketh says he welcomes the Court of Appeal’s decision in favour of the plaintiffs in the long running case Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson and others.
The nine plaintiffs, who include parents providing special care for disabled adult children, say the Ministry of Health has discriminated against them with a policy that makes family members ineligible for payment to provide disability support care their disabled relatives were otherwise entitled to.
Mr Hesketh said he had enormous respect for the resilience of the plaintiffs who have been through three court hearings over five years. He said the decision rejected outright the arguments by Crown Law representing the Ministry of Health.
Mr Hesketh hoped the comprehensive and unanimous decision by a full bench of the Court of Appeal would result in the Ministry working to resolve the issues with the plaintiffs and others affected by the policy. He said the ministry’s policy had meant the parents were effectively subsidising the cost of the care payments which were the ministry’s responsibility to fund.
Mr Hesketh congratulated the lawyers representing the parents, Frances Joychild, and David Peirse of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings, on their long hours of work and acute analysis to prepare and present a well-argued case.