- Key Focus Areas
- Enquiries & Complaints
- Human Rights
- The Treaty
- Race Relations
- Disabled People
- International & UN
- Office of Human Rights Proceedings
- Human Rights Commission condemns violent hate attack on gay Wellingtonians
- Human Rights Commission welcomes investment in Christchurch’s children
- Woman censured for using Kia ora should contact the Commission
- Dame Susan Devoy’s speech to open Islam Awareness Week: 18 August 2014
- The Right To Work: Young New Zealanders in South Auckland
- MORE NEWS
- Islam Awareness Week for all Kiwis – Human Rights Commission
- We have a lot of work to do – Race Relations Commissioner
- Human Rights Commission proud to back peace call from Kiwi interfaith leaders
- Disabled people deserve better health and education
- Access to buildings is a human right, says monitoring group
- Human Rights Commission urges politicians to stick to the major issues
- Human Rights Commission congratulates YWCA Equal Pay Award Recipients
- Deaf Maori experience on show in Wellington
- Auckland student to represent New Zealand at Human rights lab in France
- Human Rights Commission welcomes The Way Forward report
- Caring Counts: Pre Election Summit Tomorrow
- Human Rights Commission urges Police to meet with whanau over noho marae search
- Human Rights Commission urges Kiwis to keep misogynist messages off NZ roads
- Fundamental Freedoms In The Digital Age
- Homophobia – the opponent only gay athletes face
- ALL NEWS
Court of Appeal decision in favour of parents in long running case
The Director of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings Robert Hesketh says he welcomes the Court of Appeal’s decision in favour of the plaintiffs in the long running case Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson and others.
The nine plaintiffs, who include parents providing special care for disabled adult children, say the Ministry of Health has discriminated against them with a policy that makes family members ineligible for payment to provide disability support care their disabled relatives were otherwise entitled to.
Mr Hesketh said he had enormous respect for the resilience of the plaintiffs who have been through three court hearings over five years. He said the decision rejected outright the arguments by Crown Law representing the Ministry of Health.
Mr Hesketh hoped the comprehensive and unanimous decision by a full bench of the Court of Appeal would result in the Ministry working to resolve the issues with the plaintiffs and others affected by the policy. He said the ministry’s policy had meant the parents were effectively subsidising the cost of the care payments which were the ministry’s responsibility to fund.
Mr Hesketh congratulated the lawyers representing the parents, Frances Joychild, and David Peirse of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings, on their long hours of work and acute analysis to prepare and present a well-argued case.