- Key Focus Areas
- Enquiries and Complaints
- Human Rights
- The Treaty
- Disabled People
- Race Relations
- International & UN
- Office of Human Rights Proceedings
- “Inspiring Change” – International Women’s Day, 8 March
- High Court decision welcomed
- Indigenous Fellowship – OHCHR calling for applications
- Human Rights of Indigenous People in the video spotlight
- Commission releases Operation Eight human rights analysis
- MORE NEWS
- Annual OPCAT report released
- New Zealand loses disability rights champion
- Commission releases report on human rights in Canterbury recovery
- Commission extends sympathies to the South African people
- Commission welcomes growing diversity
- Non-consensual sterilisation laws for children outdated
- NZX Diversity Figures show progress is too slow
- Commission welcomes High Court decision on disabled family carers
- Commission supports policy to recognise gender identity of prisoners
- Commission welcomes Government intention to join Open Government Partnership
- Leaders in gender equality in employment celebrated
- Commission calls for explanation of progress on disturbing health statistics for New Zealanders with learning/intellectual disabilities
- UPR 13/14: Commission releases independent submission on human rights to UN
- Employment Bill inconsistent with international human rights obligations
- Commission releases report of its inquiry into New Zealand Sign Language
- ALL NEWS
Court of Appeal decision in favour of parents in long running case
The Director of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings Robert Hesketh says he welcomes the Court of Appeal’s decision in favour of the plaintiffs in the long running case Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson and others.
The nine plaintiffs, who include parents providing special care for disabled adult children, say the Ministry of Health has discriminated against them with a policy that makes family members ineligible for payment to provide disability support care their disabled relatives were otherwise entitled to.
Mr Hesketh said he had enormous respect for the resilience of the plaintiffs who have been through three court hearings over five years. He said the decision rejected outright the arguments by Crown Law representing the Ministry of Health.
Mr Hesketh hoped the comprehensive and unanimous decision by a full bench of the Court of Appeal would result in the Ministry working to resolve the issues with the plaintiffs and others affected by the policy. He said the ministry’s policy had meant the parents were effectively subsidising the cost of the care payments which were the ministry’s responsibility to fund.
Mr Hesketh congratulated the lawyers representing the parents, Frances Joychild, and David Peirse of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings, on their long hours of work and acute analysis to prepare and present a well-argued case.